|
|
|
|
Search: 
Latin American Herald Tribune
Venezuela Overview
Venezuelan Embassies & Consulates Around The World
Sites/Blogs about Venezuela
Venezuelan Newspapers
Facts about Venezuela
Venezuela Tourism
Embassies in Caracas

Colombia Overview
Colombian Embassies & Consulates Around the World
Government Links
Embassies in Bogota
Media
Sites/Blogs about Colombia
Educational Institutions

Stocks

Commodities
Crude Oil
US Gasoline Prices
Natural Gas
Gold
Silver
Copper

Euro
UK Pound
Australia Dollar
Canada Dollar
Brazil Real
Mexico Peso
India Rupee

Antigua & Barbuda
Aruba
Barbados
Cayman Islands
Cuba
Curacao
Dominica

Grenada
Haiti
Jamaica
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Belize
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Honduras
Nicaragua
Panama

Bahamas
Bermuda
Mexico

Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Guyana
Paraguay
Peru
Uruguay

What's New at LAHT?
Follow Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter
Most Viewed on the Web
Popular on Twitter
Receive Our Daily Headlines


  HOME | USA

US Supreme Court Slashes Immigrants’ Rights in Detention Centers

WASHINGTON – The United States Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that immigrants in detention centers have no right to periodic hearings to determine their possible release on bond, a decision that could lead to their indefinite detention.

The sentence is a tough blow for defenders of immigrants, since it expands President Donald Trump’s grip on migration policy and gives him greater discretion to hold foreigners in detention centers with no time limit.

The high court justices were divided on the ruling, with three against and five in favor, the latter all conservatives.

In its decision, written by conservative Justice Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court determined that immigration statutes “mandate detention of applicants for admission until certain proceedings have concluded.”

Alito added that once the court case is resolved, detention must end, but “until that point...nothing in the statutory text imposes any limit on the length of detention.”

The justices’ decision is not definitive because they asked the court of appeals in San Francisco to reconsider the case, on which it had already ruled in 2015.

At that time, the court determined that immigrants have the right to a hearing for their provisional release while the judiciary proceeded with the review of their cases

In response, the government of then-President Barack Obama considered the decision and sent the case to the Supreme Court, where it remained almost two years without the justices being able to reach a verdict.

Progressive members of the high court expressed their disagreement with Tuesday’s decision in a note that progressive Justice Stephen Breyer read in the chamber.

Breyer said that immigrants, like US citizens, have the right to a hearing that examines their confinement and can release them provisionally while the authorities decide if they must be deported or can apply for some type of asylum.

“No one can claim, nor since the time of slavery has anyone to my knowledge successfully claimed, that persons held within the United States are totally without constitutional protection,” Breyer said.

There are currently 112 detention centers in the United States where thousands of immigrants are confined for an average of 13 months, according to appellants.

The case will now be tried by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco and could be returned to the Supreme Court.

 

Enter your email address to subscribe to free headlines (and great cartoons so every email has a happy ending!) from the Latin American Herald Tribune:

 

Copyright Latin American Herald Tribune - 2005-2018 © All rights reserved