Latin American Herald Tribune
Venezuela Overview
Venezuelan Embassies & Consulates Around The World
Sites/Blogs about Venezuela
Venezuelan Newspapers
Facts about Venezuela
Venezuela Tourism
Embassies in Caracas

Colombia Overview
Colombian Embassies & Consulates Around the World
Government Links
Embassies in Bogota
Sites/Blogs about Colombia
Educational Institutions


Crude Oil
US Gasoline Prices
Natural Gas

UK Pound
Australia Dollar
Canada Dollar
Brazil Real
Mexico Peso
India Rupee

Antigua & Barbuda
Cayman Islands

Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Costa Rica
El Salvador



What's New at LAHT?
Follow Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter
Most Viewed on the Web
Popular on Twitter
Receive Our Daily Headlines

  HOME | Business & Economy (Click here for more)

EU Launches Probe of IKEA’s Tax Arrangements with the Netherlands

BRUSSELS – Swedish furniture retailer IKEA Group could be forced to pay back hundreds of millions of euros in alleged unpaid taxes to the Netherlands, following an investigation opened on Monday by the European Union.

The probe by the European Commission fits into a wider strategy to squeeze more tax revenue from large multinationals and other companies operating in Europe.

In particular, EU officials have been targeting sweetheart tax deals EU governments have granted companies in a bid to lure business to their countries.

“Member states cannot let selected companies pay less tax by allowing them to artificially shift their profits elsewhere,” said EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager. “We will now carefully investigate the Netherlands’ tax treatment of Inter IKEA.”

The EU said its investigation into the Swedish retailer of flat-packed furniture focuses on the Dutch government’s treatment of Inter IKEA Systems, one of the two groups operating the IKEA business.

The Netherlands and IKEA didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The commission said IKEA skirted paying taxes through the help of two tax rulings issued by the Netherlands in 2006 and 2011.

Tax rulings, which confirm to the company how specific taxes should be calculated, aren’t prohibited as such.

However, they are illegal if they hand the company a benefit not available to other rivals.

The commission said it believed the tax treatment given to IKEA wasn’t available to other companies in the Netherlands.

A person familiar with the matter drew a link between the EU’s probe and a 2016 report commissioned by the Green Party in the European Parliament, which accused IKEA of avoiding paying 1 billion euros ($1.18 billion) in taxes over six years.

The EU said the 2006 tax ruling endorsed a method to calculate an annual license fee that Inter IKEA Systems in the Netherlands paid to another IKEA company called I.I. Holding, based in Luxembourg.

The fee made up a significant part of Inter IKEA Systems’ revenue and resulted in the shifting of most of the company’s franchise profits to Luxembourg, where they remain untaxed, the EU said.

The Luxembourg unit was part of a special tax scheme, exempting it from corporate taxation there.

That scheme has since been declared illegal but no illegal aid had to be recovered.

The 2011 tax ruling issued by the Dutch government endorsed the price Inter IKEA Systems paid for the acquisition of the intellectual property rights from I.I. Holding. Inter IKEA received an intercompany loan from its parent company in Liechtenstein to finance the deal, the EU said.

That, in turn, allowed Inter IKEA Systems to shift its franchise profits to Liechtenstein through its interest payments on the loan, the EU said.

The commission said it would scrutinize whether those payments reflect economic reality.

The launch of the investigation into the Swedish retailer bolsters the EU’s attempts to beat back accusations that it disproportionately targets American companies, particularly in its probes into alleged illegal state aid granted via favorable tax deals.

In a blockbuster decision, the commission in 2016 ordered Apple Inc. to pay Ireland 13 billion euros, in what it said was uncollected taxes, a ruling both Apple and Ireland are contesting.

Shortly after that, the EU launched an investigation into French energy company Engie SA tax dealings with Luxembourg.

The commission has already trained its sights on Netherlands’s tax rulings in the past. The EU in 2015 ordered the Dutch government to recover millions of euros from Starbucks Corp. in allegedly unpaid taxes, a decision the Netherlands is appealing.

The EU continues to investigate Engie’s as well as McDonald’s Corp.’s tax affairs with Luxembourg.


Enter your email address to subscribe to free headlines (and great cartoons so every email has a happy ending!) from the Latin American Herald Tribune:


Copyright Latin American Herald Tribune - 2005-2018 © All rights reserved