|
|
|
|
Search: 
Latin American Herald Tribune
Venezuela Overview
Venezuelan Embassies & Consulates Around The World
Sites/Blogs about Venezuela
Venezuelan Newspapers
Facts about Venezuela
Venezuela Tourism
Embassies in Caracas

Colombia Overview
Colombian Embassies & Consulates Around the World
Government Links
Embassies in Bogota
Media
Sites/Blogs about Colombia
Educational Institutions

Stocks

Commodities
Crude Oil
US Gasoline Prices
Natural Gas
Gold
Silver
Copper

Euro
UK Pound
Australia Dollar
Canada Dollar
Brazil Real
Mexico Peso
India Rupee

Antigua & Barbuda
Aruba
Barbados
Cayman Islands
Cuba
Curacao
Dominica

Grenada
Haiti
Jamaica
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Belize
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Honduras
Nicaragua
Panama

Bahamas
Bermuda
Mexico

Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Guyana
Paraguay
Peru
Uruguay

What's New at LAHT?
Follow Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter
Most Viewed on the Web
Popular on Twitter
Receive Our Daily Headlines


  HOME | USA

US Government Asks Supreme Court to Overturn Hawaii’s Ruling on Travel Ban

WASHINGTON – The United States Justice Department filed an appeal in the Supreme Court on Friday against a Hawaii federal judge’s ruling that limited the scope of the US president’s travel ban on refugees and visitors from six Muslim-majority countries.

Hawaii-based US District Judge Derrick Watson on Thursday criticized the directives issued by Donald Trump’s administration and ruled that the travel ban could not be used against “grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins of persons in the US.”

“The Supreme Court has had to correct this lower court once, and we will now reluctantly return directly to the Supreme Court to again vindicate the rule of law and the executive branch’s duty to protect the nation,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in a statement.

Trump’s travel ban implemented on June 29 barred citizens from Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen and Libya from entering the US for 90 days, and all refugees for 120 days, unless they could prove they had close family members living in the US.

Administration officials said they considered only the parents, spouses, fiances, children and siblings to fall into the category of close family.

Civil rights organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) criticized this distinction as arbitrary, and Judge Watson ruled against the government’s implementation of the ban, saying the administration’s definition of close family was “the antithesis of common sense.”

“Common sense... dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents. Indeed grandparents are the epitome of close family members. The government’s definition excludes them. That simply cannot be,” the judge said in his ruling.

In its appeal on Friday, the Justice Department claimed that the judge’s ruling “empties the (Supreme) Court’s decision of meaning, as it encompasses not just ‘close’ family members but virtually all family members.”

Sessions criticized the Hawaii District Court and said it had “issued decisions that are entrusted to the executive branch, undermined national security, delayed necessary action, created confusion, and violated a proper respect for separation of powers.”

The travel ban came into force at the end of June after the Supreme Court ruled it could be implemented, but that people with a “bona fide relationship” to a person or entity in the US could not be barred.

The court will hear arguments on whether the ban violates the US constitution in a hearing expected to take place in October.

 

Enter your email address to subscribe to free headlines (and great cartoons so every email has a happy ending!) from the Latin American Herald Tribune:

 

Copyright Latin American Herald Tribune - 2005-2015 © All rights reserved